β€Ή
πŸ“Š
πŸ’° Goldman Stacksβ„’ πŸ’°
Intel Β· July 1, 2026 Β· by Cam
πŸ“Š Intel Β· Full Book Tracker

Burry's whole book, graded

Five weeks of Cassandra Unchained (May 25 – Jul 1) distilled into one page Β· July 1, 2026

I went back through every post from the last five weeks β€” twelve Trading Posts and deep-dives β€” and tracked every disclosed position. This is the full map, not just the picks we've already covered. Grades are mine, on the strength of each argument, not a prediction. Burry himself keeps repeating that shorting rarely pays and his book is "mostly long most of the time."

The lens behind every call

Four ideas drive everything:

1. The 2000 rerun. He sees a "clonal repeat" of the Jan–Mar 2000 internet top β€” NASDAQ-100, the SOX semis index, and mega-IPOs (SpaceX, Anthropic) tracking the 2000 pattern. His playbook mirrors his original Scion launch: buy hated non-AI value while shorting the mania's fulcrum points with cheap puts.

2. The valuation system. "IV15" intrinsic-value multiples, "Tragic Algebra" (penalizes stock-comp dilution), and Castle / Chapel / Stone moat tiers for AI durability.

3. The turnover signal. A stock that's traded 3–5Γ— its share count since its peak has moved into "steadier hands" and may be near a bottom. His main timing tool for catching falling knives. (Yes β€” the same signal I red-teamed on June 18. Still holds.)

4. Machines as lead steer. Algos and foundation models now dominate trading β€” his evidence is Fibonacci levels "working" again β€” and thin options volume plus dealer-gamma dynamics set up violent air-pocket declines in crowded names like NVIDIA.

The full book (as disclosed)

Shorts / puts: NVDA (puts) Β· PLTR (covered half the stock short at ~$107, keeps puts) Β· ORCL (puts) Β· QQQ (puts) Β· SOXX (puts + shorted the ETF, his DRAM/memory-cycle vehicle) Β· TSLA (short) Β· CAT (short, opened Jun 30) Β· AMAT (short, opened Jun 30).

US / Western longs: LULU (flagship, avg ~$124.65) Β· ADBE Β· PYPL Β· FISV Β· VEEV Β· ZTS Β· SFM Β· FMCC & FNMA Β· MELI Β· HCA Β· BIRK Β· MSFT (via long-dated LEAPs β€” wants the common near $350).

Asia / China longs: Samsung Electronics (top-3 fund position, bought at tangible book) Β· Tencent Β· Meituan Β· JD Β· BABA Β· Haidilao Β· Haier. Watching: BYD (mid-HK$70s) and PDD's HK listing.

The Samsung tension: Samsung is simultaneously a top-3 long (cheap franchise at book value) AND part of his memory-glut short via SOXX. He's long the company, short the cycle's blow-off. Galaxy-brain or hedged β€” you decide.

πŸ”₯ Hottest theses

Short DRAM/memory via SOXX β€” Aβˆ’. Built on executives declaring cyclicality "structurally" dead (his textbook contrarian sell signal), the HBM "3Γ— wafer" glut mechanic, record margins, and the 1998–2003 analogue where DRAM fell 93% even with a price-fixing cartel. Risk: pure timing β€” early-2027 puts expire worthless if AI-inference hoarding persists.

Long Samsung β€” Aβˆ’ (best risk-defined long). Mechanical rule: buy at tangible book. Eight prior instances over 30 years, ~24.6% annualized since 1998. The entry rule removes the guesswork. Risk: it's already run off book, and it's the same memory cycle he's shorting elsewhere.

Long LULU β€” B+ (most detailed deep-dive). ~2.5Γ— tangible book (lowest since 2009), under 10Γ— earnings, ~$1.5B net cash, $1B buyback against a ~$12B cap, IV15 $155.81 (0.72Γ—), Ross Stores 2000 doppelganger. Risk he names himself: capricious branded retail, and it hinges entirely on unproven new CEO Heidi O'Neill (arrives Sept 8).

Long FISV + payments basket β€” B+. The thesis we broke down on June 18 (and red-teamed): 99% core retention, record ~$8 EPS, ~1.4Γ— IV15, FIUSD stablecoin optionality. CEO exit flagged as "thesis violation β†’ re-evaluate, not sell."

Long MELI & HCA β€” B (quietly high-quality). MELI bought on the turnover signal (~246% of shares traded, ~39% off the high). HCA on his "buy at 10–12Γ— earnings, period" rule β€” currently dinged by the ACA-subsidy lapse, which he calls noise that hurts competitors more.

πŸ₯Ά Coldest theses

Short CAT β€” Cβˆ’ (coldest fresh trade). He admits he's never shorted it and it's "always done great on the long side." The entire basis is a chart extended above the 200-day moving average. No fundamental teardown, no valuation, no catalyst. This is the one I'd fade hardest.

Short CRWD β€” A as analysis, D as a trade. Devastating teardown: dead last of his 50 software names, 23Γ— IV15, ~22% stock-comp with no buyback, ~4.5%/yr dilution. But he is NOT short it β€” only "considered" it β€” because at all-time highs it can double before it halves. His own "sand castle" warning in action.

Short PLTR β€” C+ (cooling). Still core (16Γ— IV15), but covering half the stock short at $107 and leaning on puts is a tacit retreat on his most crowded short. No near-term catalyst.

China basket β€” Bβˆ’ (high conviction, structurally cold). Best argument: the bond market β€” tight CDS on Tencent/Alibaba/Meituan vs blown-out Oracle/CoreWeave β€” says these are far safer than equity prices imply. But he concedes the "uninvestable" label has real basis: VIE structures and CCP policy create genuine zero-tails, and delivery-war margin recovery is "a year or more away."

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Sidebar: actually buying Samsung

No normal US listing β€” you can't just click buy like Apple. Roughly best-to-easiest: (1) the Korea primary line 005930.KS via a broker with KRX access (Interactive Brokers is the usual retail route; trades in won, Korea hours) β€” this is the actual common Burry references. (2) The London GDR β€” settles USD/GBP, thinner liquidity. (3) US OTC unsponsored ADR SSNLF β€” one-click if your broker allows it, but grey-market thin with wide spreads; limit orders only. (4) EWY (Korea ETF) β€” liquid, but diluted with dozens of names and you can't run his tangible-book entry rule on it. To replicate the signal you'd track tangible book per share on the Korea line and buy at/below ~1.0Γ—.

Bottom line: The strongest ideas in the book are the rule-based longs (Samsung at book, HCA at 10–12Γ—, MELI on turnover) and the DRAM-cycle short. The weakest are the chart-driven shorts (CAT especially) and the tail-risk in the China basket. And the fault line under everything: the whole book assumes AI is a 2000-style bubble around a real trend. If AI demand is a bigger, more durable plateau than the internet was in 2000, the memory glut arrives later and shallower, the puts expire worthless, and the orphan longs stay orphaned longer than his options β€” or our patience β€” can hold.
Not financial advice. Goldman Stacks is a group chat having fun. Grades are Cam's read on the strength of each argument, not predictions. Burry's own warning applies: shorting is very risky and rarely profitable. Do your own work and size your own risk.
β€Ή back to the board